 |
|
 |


 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| From: (Anonymous) |
Date: April 11th, 2006 09:50 pm (UTC) |
| (Link) |
Re: Faith based schools in Uk
|
Unfortunately you have unwittingly, only highlighted the problem of non-faith based schools. What in effect you are saying is that if you are an ideological (let's say 'New Labour') teacher, then by following their 'beliefs', you do have a chance of promotion. In fact, I cannot believe that you are not already aware that many non-New Labour believers, also have no chance of promotion within the Public Sector. Did you also know that recently, the liberal non-faith EU, vetoed a Roman Catholic as an EU commissioner, thereby ensuring for perpetuity, that Roman Catholics will never be able to hold such a position. Finally, and most important, if the alternative to non-faith schools is unacceptable, after all, there are many people who find the non-faith acceptance of abortion on demand totally abhorrent, why should they join such 'enlightened' forward looking people in the non-faith sector. Don't confuse faith and ideology, they are both beliefs, the significant difference is that it was ideology that is responsible for in excess of 100,000,000 deaths in Stalinist Russia and Maoist China, not faith schools. Most prejudices today are in fact, not prejudices, but differences of opinion/belief. It is only the advent of the New Labour apparatchik that has used these to create endless divisions in a once largely tolerant society. I await with trepidation the knock on the door at 3.00 in the morning?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: vexen |
Date: January 3rd, 2007 10:47 pm (UTC) |
| (Link) |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|  |
 |




 |
 |
|

 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| From: (Anonymous) |
Date: October 21st, 2008 01:35 am (UTC) |
| (Link) |
Re: i dissagree!
|
People have biases. What not name them and allow parents to make informed decisions regarding the education of their children? The statement that we should not "force" our ideas and beliefs on our children is simply preposterous. I have yet to meet a child who likes my ideas on childhood immunizations and eating vegetables before ice cream. As parents we are given the obligation to "force" our ideas on these uncivilized infants in the process of raising them to become thinking functioning adults. This, of course, includes thought on tolerance and love of humanity, and religion.
Clearly schools should be required to reach academic minimum standards, but if the leaders and teachers of a school have strong religious leanings, I as a parent would like it to be publicly claimed so that I am aware of what my children are being taught.
I prefer the option of avoiding an honest bigot over inadvertently exposing my children to the hidden agenda of a school that claims to be open to all yet quietly pushes a moral agenda that I do not want my children exposed to.
Additionally, no school can meet the needs of all children. A school for the musically gifted would be devalued by requiring it to accept students from all backgrounds. Additionally schools for the academically gifted, should not be required to reduce its standards for the academically challenged. The more diverse the student body, the more the school must diversify its limited resources to educate.
Parents with strong religious beliefs should have the option of carrying this into the children's academic lives. Much as we wish our beliefs in tolerance of fellow man present in the academic environment that our children spend most of their waking hours, Christians desire Christian perspectives be taught in the academic area including literature, history and even science. To deny the opportunity to include these studies in education is denying them the opportunity to be Christian.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

|  |
 |

|
 |