 |
|
 |



 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: vexen |
Date: December 29th, 2005 10:33 am (UTC) |
| (Link) |
|
1) Obviously the churches deviate largely from many of the reports on what Jesus teachings are. Also, it is closer to some reports than others. In total, though, the Church is corrupt and evil, it's people are deluded and lost and it does more harm than good. The more powerful the Church, the worse it is. The worst is obviously the Catholic Church, with it's continutal legal and nasty attacks on homosexuality, contraception (even in Africa where it is needed most), etc. There is something about Christianity that brings out the worst in people. Although as you say there are good Christians: You don't have to be bad, to be confused.
2) The current Pope was not "big in the Nazi movement", he was drafted in as a youngster, as all youngsters were, by force. By all accounts he was not a Nazi or a sympathizer. And believe me, I must be being honest in order to defend the pope!
"Catholicism" does not have the same beliefs as the Nazis; one was a political/paranoid racist/x-generation power mongering cabal, and the other was a politica/paranoid delusional/traditionalist power mongering pseudo-cabal.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: whune |
Date: December 29th, 2005 04:18 am (UTC) |
| (Link) |
|
"...praying is definitely not to reveal things to an all-knowing God." *nod*
"the wishes of prayer can only ever be against God's will, as I have elaborated on above."
An understandable summation, but you're missing something. (You'll forgive if this sounds preachy, i've no intention to set up soap box on your personal turf)
This ties into the whole 'free-will' thing: Way back with Adam and Eve, mankind choose the Satan, and was then left to the consequences of their choice. I don't understand the details of the grand plan, but basically Christ was introduced as the 'take it or leave it' attonement and for the most part God just leaves us to our own device, unless we request otherwise. How does this relate to prayer?
Well God, the loving father he is like the dad sitting up at home holding the cell-phone for his wayward kid to call, so he can go help him (it does no good unless the kid asks, or one he won't ever learn, and two he'll just be driven further away); for the most part God only acts in our lives* at our request.
*and for the most part only in the lives of the 'saved' if you aren't his kid He's not going to be bailing you out of jail.
also, there are types of 'prayer' well a lot of things that most might think of as prayer, but are clearly demonstrated in public the New Testament: Blessing (food and other people) Laying on of hands.
Perhaps this is irrelevant... I'm not sure you classify those as prayer, but most 'Christians' do, and I think that has something to do with their confusion.
It seems 'prayer' is only the private, one on one, communication with God.
"God acts only when God knows it is good to act" This is very true and gets into the whole point of prayer: Whereas witchcraft brings you what you want (an admitted simplification and you'll pardon if i'm just completely off), God only gives it if its best.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: vexen |
Date: December 29th, 2005 10:39 am (UTC) |
| (Link) |
Adam and Eve
|
Adam and Eve is not a literal truth, I'm afraid, and you'll find most Christians (apart from fundamentalists and evangelicals) don't actually believe in a physical Adam and Eve.
But... about that story... Adam and Eve didn't "choose Satan"; they chose to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Before then, they didn't know what evil or good was. They were innocent. As such, as there was no sin yet and no concept of sin, they could not choose "against" or "for" goodness. They didn't know what deceit was, was lying was, what "rebelling against God" was. All those things were sinful things that God had not yet revealed to them or even created. "Sin was created through one man". When they "chose", it was just the way it went and it was not a real "choice", they were lied to and God didn't think that a little knowledge-of-good-and-evil might have enabled them a real truth. There was no free will involved in that story, just naivity and the inaction of an uncaring parent.
Thankfully, then, the story is obviously not true, because otherwise the only thing it would show us is that God is bad, not good.
As for the rest, Jesus says what "prayer" is, "blessings" and the other magical things you mention are all psychology, older pagan practices, etc, and although it might be considered "prayer" by some Christians today it is not, technically, prayer unless it is a prayer.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |




 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hi I am not entering into debate here. I just wanted to say that although you come from a different system of ideas from me, I am always interested in reading your thoughts. I happen to be a Christian and at one point was quite fundementalist and evangelical, but over the years I have come to realise that there are things I am not sure of, and have considered the internal doubts I have struggled with for years. I for one do not support the intelligent design theory that is being supported and find it incongorous with scientific analysis of fossil records for example. I also do not see how it is entirely impossible to reconcile my own faith as a Christian and my support for the research of Darwin. I could never call myself a fundemntalist anymore.
With regard to prayer. I did once find a really interesting statement on prayer by a Rabbi, he said it was not about us asking God to fix things for us, because God already knew that we needed the car repair money, the new job, the sickness in the family healed, the safe journey etc etc. Prayer is about reforming ourselves. I read that following much frustration over my own prayers feeling like they were hitting an empty sky, whilst others had their answered. Such struggles included wondering why some couple in the church got their prayers answered when they prayed for £3000 for an extention to their conservatory, and yet when my friends dad, who was a really devout Christian and missionary, died young from cancer despite our fervent prayers for his healing. It just did not make any sense.
I think that when people say things like "I'll pray for you" they mean that they are wishing for good things to happen for someone. Its almost Christian way of saying "I hope your life is lucky". I have also encountered people saying "We're praying for you" when they think you are leading a wrongful life. I get it from people because they do not approve of my relationship with a transgender person, Louise gets it because she is transgender and an atheist. So sometimes the motives are all selfish too. Its like they are saying "I am opposed to your choices so I am hoping that you will oneday admit that my way is the best way".
Anyway, I do not want to turn your thread into a therapy outlet so I'll stop here, I just wanted to share some of my own thoughts.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: vexen |
Date: December 30th, 2005 02:29 pm (UTC) |
| (Link) |
|
I know you're a Christian :-) and I remember a few bits of what you said from things you've said before years ago (2001/2002). Obviously Darwin & science & realistic knowledge cannot rest with fundamentalism of any kind (be it those who are scientifically closed-minded (not really 'scientific'), or those who are religiously fundamentalist).
When you say prayer is about self-reforming, from a liberal and classical Christian point of view this is obviously true; God is immutable, and it's *you* who your God wants to change; so it would probably support prayer as a method to get that done. From my point of view it's psychology, the same as meditation, but if you consider it to "get things done" externally then it is magic, the same as casting spells with words.
The psychology surrounding "I'll pray for you" statements is interesting, and mostly not very flattering! It's not very often I feel it is a genuinely altrustic offer!
I would say it doesn't "make any sense" that some people appear to have their prayer answers, and other sometimes more deserving people don't... because there is no God to answer such calls, so I don't have those kind of cognitive problems although I can imagine where you're coming from.
I've always thought it great & hope-inspiring about you & Louise, you two are a good example in many ways.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |


 |
 |
|

 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: vexen |
Date: January 5th, 2006 10:05 pm (UTC) |
| (Link) |
|
1) The Lords Prayer is Jewish in origin, "Hallowed by thy name" and all that is a series of Jewish proverbs and prayers; they occur variously in the Judaic books of the Bible & the Torah. Alfred Reynolds in "Jesus Versus Christianity" traces each line of the Lord's Prayer in great depth in Greek, Hebrew and English, I was going to include a section on it in my page, do you think I should? I believe it is part of the Sermon on the Mount, the name given to the collection of Jewish sayings (including the Beautitudes 'Blessed are the poor', etc) that occurs in a part of the book of Matthew. Freke & Gandy say that not only is the Lords Prayer Jewish in origin, but that the versions we have is a mixture of Jewish sayins and early Roman pagan religions such as Mithraism. The original aramaic version is very different to the way we translate it nowadays. It doesn't start "Father, who art in heaven"... but, "O cosmic Birther of all radiance and vibration" ... which for a start sounds female, not male, like all other early pagan gods. 2) Nonetheless, it is true that protestants used Jesus' words to condemn the countless ritual prayers of Catholicism. Remember that protestants used to have no set liturgy; there is more now, such as the standard church services you correctly mention. Such things do not sit well with what the authors of Matthew, Mark and Luke think Jesus would have said! 3) I am interested, do you know who is speaking? St Paul's writings are the earliest Christian writings we have - they were probably the first to be written - but his anti-human laws, rules and misanthropy led Nietzsche to say in " The AntiChrist" that "The glad tidings were followed closely by the absolutely worst tidings - those of St Paul.", and proceeds to call a "dysvangelist".
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |


|
 |