From: nyatnee	Date: April 2nd, 2006 09:47 pm (UTC)		(Link)
	book of satan

i was wondering if there is a way I can get a free copy of the book of satan or where i can get one.

From: (Anonymous)	Date: April 25th, 2006 09:28 pm (UTC)		(Link)

i dont have the book and i have not read the book

From: (Anonymous)	Date: November 3rd, 2006 11:21 pm (UTC)		(Link)
book

this is the most dumest thing in the world why do you wast your life with this

From: (Anonymous)	Date: February 1st, 2008 03:45 pm (UTC)		(Link)
Re: book

because some of us like to read more than one "bible" others of us are learning who we r and therefore maybe this shines some light on our beliefs and others may read it for fun...if you are christian or catholic...please leave your hypocritism at other websites...to each there own...this is america...one of our consitutional rights is freedom of religion...go back to highschool if u missed that class

	From: finklized	Date: February 1st, 2008 03:46 pm (UTC)		(Link)
	Re: book

because some of us like to read more than one "bible" others of us are learning who we r and therefore maybe this shines some light on our beliefs and others may read it for fun...if you are christian or catholic...please leave your hypocritism at other websites...to each there own...this is america...one of our consitutional rights is freedom of religion...go back to highschool if u missed that class

From: (Anonymous)	Date: January 11th, 2008 04:13 pm (UTC)		(Link)

U don't have to waste your life to make a comment if u don't like it. Just leave it.

From: (Anonymous)	Date: February 9th, 2008 05:09 am (UTC)		(Link)
Conder's Edition (2005)

Read the 2005 introduction to Might is Right by Darrell W. Conder. There is NO WAY that book was written by Arthur Desmond or Jack London. It's a ridiculous myth. And Conder's edition of the text is worth getting for all the INCREDIBLY insightful footnotes that he added throughout it. He makes it more of a joy than ever to read through and to understand the context so much better.

	From: vexen	Date: February 9th, 2008 10:26 am (UTC)		(Link)
	Re: Conder's Edition (2005)

Thank you for widening the horizons a bit, I didn't know that the authorship was quite so disputed.

	From: mrda	Date: February 24th, 2008 02:37 pm (UTC)		(Link)
	Re: Conder's Edition (2005)