From: vexen	Date: December 30th, 2004 07:18 am (UTC)		(Link)
	Re: Jesus H Christ

Tee hee... ok... I've noted the error. I can't fix it for a while because I'm not with my own computer & source files etc, but will fix it on next upload.

Thanks for letting me know.

From: (Anonymous)	Date: January 10th, 2005 06:40 pm (UTC)		(Link)
Re: Jesus H Christ

The "Tee-Heh" was kind of homosexual. You're not a homosexual are you Vexeb Crabtree? ( i Love the name by the way ) However, I've read most of the arguments and comments made by both the people who support if Christ was real and by those, such as Mr. Cratree who i will refer to as "Tee-Heh", who don't believe that Christ existed. For Tee-Heh and everyone else who beleives that Christ didn't exist... YOU NEED TO BACK YOUR OPINIONS UP WITH EVIDENCE! You can't simply sat that there are no Roman Documents and simply leave it at that. Actually, every single letter that the apostle Paul wrote while he was imprisioned was copied by the Roman emporer Nero because he was obsessed with literature and philosophy. He read everyone of Paul's letter, so yes, they were Roman documents when Nero filed them under his personal library as "Letters retaining to the Christ from Paul"...DO SOME REAL RESEARCH TEE-HEH! Get some real facts, learn your history. I read half the stuff you write and i taste a little bit fo upchuck in my mouth everytime you don't back up your opinion. YOU HAVE VERY GOOD ARGUMENTS TEE-HEH, but none that give you any creditability that you know exactly what you're talking about. PS - I can't spell. In Christ, Baret - 18

	From: vexen	Date: January 10th, 2005 08:09 pm (UTC)		(Link)
	Re: Jesus H Christ

Paul never met Jesus in person; his only contact with Jesus (as Paul admits) is in a vision. This is far from "proof" that Jesus existed.

From: (Anonymous)	Date: July 6th, 2005 02:01 pm (UTC)		(Link)
Re: Jesus H Christ

Vexen... this is Dean (we used to debate on Logic and God a few years back.) What I have found most interesting about your thoughts, and the reason why I cannot take you seriously, is that you smash EVERYTHING that has a hint of religiosity and you cannot fathom that ANY of Christianity, or any other religion, has a hint of truth. It simply seems that your bias against religion has infected your reason. I know this hits home, because this is what you accuse Christians of all the time!
Here is the fact of the matter: Very few, if any, secular historians (who have a ph.d. in their field of study) see the 1st and 2nd century writings about Jesus as fraudulent (I will give you the Josephus quote, but he did have another quote about Christians that is not tainted) or view them as inadequate proof that a man named Jesus existed who had disciples, many followers, was crucified by Pontius Pilate, and whose disciples believed that he rose from the dead.
Honestly, in order to show that you are a reasonable person, I would reconsider your position on the existence of Jesus. No non-Christian historian would agree with you. They have no reason to believe that he existed! (besides the evidence) But because of your irrational bias, it has clouded your reason.
DH

From: (Anonymous)	Date: September 23rd, 2005 01:56 pm (UTC)		(Link)
Re: Jesus H Christ

Vexen...
Will you not dignify the last blog with your own response...?
Thanks,
Dean

From: (Anonymous)	Date: January 14th, 2006 05:36 pm (UTC)		(Link)
Re: Jesus H Christ

Please point me to where it says this because I don believe you

	From: vexen	Date: January 14th, 2006 07:10 pm (UTC)		(Link)
	Re: Jesus H Christ

I'm not in my study at the moment so don't have a Bible to hand, but, the occasion of Paul's vision was on the Road to Damascus; which occurred when Jesus was quite some distance away on a different journey. Also, note that St Paul only writes of Jesus in mystical, ethereal terms and would probably be surprised that people nowadays think he was a real physical person.