Links
Vexen Crabtree's Live Journal - Matthew
Sociology, Theology, Anti-Religion and Exploration: Forcing Humanity Forwards
vexen
[info]vexen
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Matthew

Read essay online and leave comment here

Tags: ,
Current Mood: productive
Listening To: "Angel" by Aerosmith

Comments
From: (Anonymous) Date: August 1st, 2003 08:26 am (UTC) (Link)

Matthew

Would you kindly send me the
Matthew Chapter 20 1-16

Thank you for your kind response......
Cecile
vexen From: [info]vexen Date: August 1st, 2003 09:22 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: Matthew

From: (Anonymous) Date: November 6th, 2004 02:09 am (UTC) (Link)

You are trying to cover truth with lies

ALMAH" is used seven times in the Hebrew Bible, and in each instance it either explicitly means a virgin or implies it, because in the Bible "`ALMAH" always refers to an unmarried woman of good reputation. In Genesis 24:43 it applies to Rebecca, Isaac's future bride, already spoken of in Genesis 24:16 as a B'TULAH. In Exodus 2:8 it describes the infant Moshe's older sister Miryam, a nine- year-old girl and surely a virgin. (Thus the name of Yeshua's mother recalls this earlier virgin.) The other references are to young maidens being courted (Proverbs 30:19) and virgins of the royal court (Song of Songs 1:3, 6:8). In each case the context requires a young unmarried woman of good reputation, i.e., a virgin.


Moreover, Mattityahu here is quoting from the Septuagint, the first of the TANAKH into Greek. More than two centuries before Yeshua was born, the Jewish translators of the Septuagint chose the Greek word "PARTHENOS" to render "`ALMAH." "PARTHENOS" unequivocally means "VIRGIN." This was long before the New Testament made the matter controversial.

From: (Anonymous) Date: February 4th, 2005 01:06 am (UTC) (Link)

Re: You are trying to cover truth with lies

Thank you for stepping up and taking a stand. I admire that sooo much. You helped me when i was looking for research on how CHristianity improves schools,and peoples morals in schools for a research paper i have to do. It's so sad to see how many people are trying to escape the truth. this site almost made me extrememly mad, but instead has shown me hope, maybe this site will upset those who believe in Christ, and just arent living it.
From: (Anonymous) Date: February 22nd, 2006 09:09 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: Pathetic and futile

*sigh* I hate rhetoric as an attempt to prove a ridiculously blind beliefs to ease a shaky ego. That's what religion does to the masses. Sanctimony is truly our bane, a mental disease, and a cancer of the ego. Isaiah 7.14 speaks of a girl "who is presently a virgin." Not when the baby is delivered! What does it matter anyway? Matthew and Luke try to prove Jesus being a decendent of David through Joseph! That being because back then the only way a person was considered to be a decendent of someone was through the father since the ovary wasn't discovered until the year 1812. Your sophistic perversion of philology doesn't change this.
GOD IS NOT AN ESOTERIC PRANKSTER OF CRYPTIC WRITINGS!!

From: (Anonymous) Date: November 10th, 2004 04:50 am (UTC) (Link)

Amen     hotep   0á  

[Transcript of an audio recording]

*clap of thunder followed by a background ghostly robotic music*

“Myriad moons ago, in the land of Pharaoh, there came to power a Being of wondrous propensities.
He was called Amenhotep IV. Amemhotep IV envisioned, and then implemented, a monumental and unsurpassed addition to culture. Amenhotep IV was the first to have a society introduced to the theology of a one-god religion. Yes, Amenhotep IV institutionalized monotheism, a religion of one god.

This was a true monotheism, not the polytheism that Judaism, Christianity and Islam, each usually having at least two gods ~ the one all-benevolent, the other all-evil ~ have been for hundreds and hundreds of years.
Yes, Amenhotep proclaimed the Aten, the Sun God, as the only god in all the universe; he even changed his name to reflect this new devotional imagery.

No prosaic Pharaoh was he, the works of Egyptian art were advanced to a vastly, almost impressionist, beautiful form.
Of course when a vast change comes many resist it. After all, the feebleminded peasants were content to have had their religion spoonfeed to them by, less than astute, ancestors.
The established priests didn’t want one-god concepts cutting into their lucrative, wholly unholy, business.

Nevertheless, the Pharaohs were considered gods in their own right.
Ergo, any opposition to the new religion was wee and reserved. But the only people to sincerely embrace Amenhotep’s religion were the upperclass, very well educated members of his governmental theocratic oligarchy. This was no small number, the ancient Egyptian government was a vast institution.

Not terribly long after Amenhotep’s demise the priests and peasants of the polytheist deities were once again able to gain political power.
They began a systematic, and extremely well financed, program of wiping any trace of the reign of Amenhotep IV from the face of the Earth. His name, original as well as his new, were obliterated from temple, obelisk, monument and papyrus.
The polytheist re-writers of history were very efficient, but not 100% so. Monotheism’s followers were also persecuted.
To even utter the former Pharaoh’s name was a crime punishable by a sound thrashing or even death!
Thus, these believes in a single god, who used to end all prayers by speaking the new name Amenhotep had chosen, reverted back to ending their supernally aimed beseeching with the words - “Freed From Doubt by Amenhotep.”

But this was also seen as a blasphemous act by the ancient polytheistic spin-doctors. So, they needed to conclude their prayers, to their singular god, with another sound of solemn ratification.
And that way soon became the word - - - AMEN !

Moreover, those who descended from Amenhotep’s followers, though many changes have been made to their religion over the long years, became know as.....the Jews.

*music now becomes the gospel classic “Amen” with a satirical lyrical redo*

Amen
Hotep
Amen hotep amen
Groovin’ with his sweety
her name was Nefertiti
amen hotep amen
real style down by the Nile
a pile of pâté crocodile
amen hotep hotep

{ fin }
[To hear this work and “Jesus Christ the Facts” (The history of how Ovid created the Jesus of Nazareth/Christ character) check the URL.]

http://www.ic-musicmedia.com/artist_pages/songpage.php?mp3id=83390


From: (Anonymous) Date: February 28th, 2005 06:38 pm (UTC) (Link)

Herod

You have some good information on your site, but several of your points are not correct.

Herod the Great is noted by Joshephus to have killed several of his own children. Given the size of Bethlehem at the time, it is estimated that about 2 dozen children would have been younger than two. I am not saying that Herod did order this act, but evidence leads us to believe that this event was completely possible.

It is also important to understand that these are not written accounts of Jesus' life by the disciples. These were the teachings and understanding of community, and what they had come to believe about Jesus. Even if none of these events are historically accurate, it speaks volumes that the community thought so much Jesus that they believed this.
From: (Anonymous) Date: January 9th, 2006 09:48 pm (UTC) (Link)

Gospel of Matthew

The Gospel of Matthew contains a great deal of astronomical and astrological allegory. The Gospel was apparently written for the 'scientists' (astrologers/astronomers) of that time.
Matthew's gospel contains some astrological/astronomical information that is 'encoded' in some of the dimensions of The Great Pyramid at Giza.
See, http://www.templeofsolomon.org (generally) for more complete information.
sushidog From: [info]sushidog Date: August 15th, 2006 05:05 pm (UTC) (Link)
Hi, I know I'm several months late on this, but I've just been pointed to yuor page, and I had a quick question; you say that the first two chapters of Matthew were not in the original version of Matthew's Gospel, but you don't provide a source for this, and it's not something I've heard elsewhere; could you clarify? Where does this claim come from, and how can it possibly be verified, in the absence of an original first edition copy (as it were) of Matthew's writings?
From: (Anonymous) Date: March 7th, 2008 01:26 pm (UTC) (Link)

Matthew Fraud

You appear not to have understood the word "According".
i.e. The Gospel According To Matthew.
Not in the sense that Matthew wrote the Gospel but "According" to Matthew this Gospel is true.
Posted by and serious replys to:
Alexander McMillan
alexandermcmillan@hotmail.com
10 Comments or Make Comment