2005

vexen

Vexen Crabtree's Live Journal

Sociology, Theology, Anti-Religion and Exploration: Forcing Humanity Forwards


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
2005
vexen

Refuting Monotheism

Refuting Monotheism: There is no God


Re: Logical flaws

(Anonymous)

2005-07-26 11:57 pm (UTC)

Your first argument I agree with mostly, but I think that there needs to be both qualifications made and also to define what would be an arbitrary reference point by which God would choose something to be good.
Atheists will always run into inherent problems when assuming that morality can come by means of logic alone. Kant sought to do just this and his morality turned into pragmatism but Kant never abandoned his presupposition that God does in fact exist. Sartre, Camus, Russell, huxley and the like all admitted lucidly, candidly, or elusively to the necessity of an eternally good being for the qualifications of objective morals. If in fact morality is simply pragmatic and societal, then what qualification comes to the defense of one angry at another human for an " injustice", or "ill-treatment" On what system of values rests the propensity to vindicate the perpetrators of crimes against humanity. What authority has lended itself to finite, intellectually limited beings for the sake of justice by means of honor and value?
During the NUrenburg trials, one of the accused stated exactly this argument. He claimed that his actions were based on the morality of his land and that his actions were in strict coherence to what they believed to be both right and Good. His pragmatic answer was silenced by the prosecution which called upon a morality which was higher than that of the countries themselves. I also find it remarkable that those who endured the greatest single event against the history of men still maintain a sense of right and wrong. But more important, they accept a system of right and wrong qualifying it by something autonomous to themselves and their ill-fated circumstances.
If you are thinking that I have yet to introduce any evidence on the side of logic than I appologize for the mistake, but in my estimation, our experiences hold a greater sense of understanding than that which we may theoretically propound in the consequent free environment of our minds. I am only seeking to show that the test of truth is not just the systems of logic which we may apply to ones argument. As we all can understand who study both logic and philosophy, truth is far more difficult to prove then showing a simple syllogism and or truth table applied to our argument. What we have to understand is that God can not be disproved nor proved. The non-existence of God may not be proved or disproved since neither position is empirical although i believe one to be epistemological.
I also find it ironic when you spoke against the non-truth claims made by the site itself. Yous said that if nothing is true than what is the point of this web-site. Well may I suggest that you re-read your statement and answer the very justification of a claim to truth. You said that if nothing is true, this web-site is destroyed but by what admission can something be truth if truth is not autonomous from the existence of all thing. If truth can be autonomous, than by what logic will prevail for the proving of the non-existence of a God who is autonomous from man. Why is one legitimate and logical and the other seen as being foolish and whimsical.If all that exists is space, time, and matter contructed by chaos and chance, than there is no alternate reality; there is nothing autonomous from that which is physically tangible.
Most often I here of the argument which Hume so desperately sought to justify was the statement which, in essence, says that all volumes of Divinity are nothing more than sophistry and illusion since they are neither scientific nor mathematic. The logical contradiction is that the statement itself is neither mathematical nor scientific and is posited in a metaphysical form of argumentation nullifying the statement itself. Logic, truth, and God would all necessarily be casted to the same fiery tomb since non of these systems and/or entities are mathematical or scientific.
One last thing, if God exists, so also does he have an inherent and intrinsic personality and charcter which can not be deviated from. Only in the answers offered by the Bible can one see that God is inherently Good, Just, Loving, kind, fair, and is truth. These are the cornerstones of our knowledge, our desires, and our personalities.

Re: One last thing... (was: Logical Flaws)

vexen

2005-08-06 11:49 am (UTC)

The Christian Bible *also* shows God as inherently evil, has God state that it itself is "a jealous god", very unfair, and in the Bible are verses where God itself sows confusion, closes hearts and does other things very much in contradiction with "truth" or "kindness".

For example "God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness" (2 Thessalonians)

Re: One last thing... (was: Logical Flaws)

(Anonymous)

2006-07-17 11:29 pm (UTC)

You fool.
why do you think God has done this to us? Would you let someone into your house if they scorned it, stole from it or damaged it? What if the person had told many lies about you? surely you wouldn't want that person to come into your house? God confuses us to test our faith in Him. If we can rise above the evil that tempts us then God will surely let us into His kingdom. even if the person is evil and sins and blasphemes, God's word is still inside them , so that they may still turn back from the devil to His love. He's got it all planned. And another thing- the Bible was not descended from Heaven but writtn by MAN, those who were eye witnesses to Jesus and His teachings. No-one understands God fully, not even the Bible. even Jesus Himself claimed that he didn't know when the day of judgement would come and He was the one that was God's Son. God created us so that we may have free will over our lives so that we may prove how loyal and faithful we are to Him. Anyone who repents and confesses their sins and becomes sinful no more will be blessed by God. No matter how evil someone is, they can be forgiven if they have confessed and repented with all their might. So let me ask you something, have you been deluded by the lie? I suggest you start praying for forgiveness, for Hell is a lot easier to enter than Heaven.

You are viewing vexen